Slamming Science

I was watching a BBO expert game
when East–West misfired with these

♠ A Q 4
A J 5
7 4
♣ K 9 7 6 3
♠ 5
K 9 4 2
K Q 8 3
♣ A Q J 5
WEst East
1♣ 1
1NT 3♣
3 5♣

Making six. Personally, I wouldn’t have thought twice about raising 1 to 2 as West, though the 1NT bid was not clearly wrong. But when East jumped to 5♣, West surely could have bid 6♣ with two aces and a fifth club. Maybe he was worried about diamonds, but it’s hard to imagine an East hand that would bid 5♣ with neither major-suit ace and nothing in diamonds.

Some players might cite the Principle of Fast Arrival: “East’s 5♣, instead of 4♣, said he wanted to play there: A bid of 5♣ is weaker than 4♣.” I would reply that no bid that offers to play at an 11-trick contract can be “weak.”

The auction, I thought, was a reflection of modern expert slam bidding. Players are too cautious. They over-focus on science. They fear bidding a slam unless it will be cold even against crystal-ball defense.

Here are six slam-bidding principles that this curmudgeon stands by:

To continue reading, click here.

Not a member? Click here to join.

The Zoom Room is available Monday through Friday, 3:30 pm-5:30 pm (Eastern).

Getting help is easier than ever with the ACBL Zoom Chat service.
Simply click the "Join Zoom Chat" button below to be taken to our dedicated zoom room.
Once there, click the "Launch Meeting" button to start your session. To hear us and vice-versa - don't forget to "Join with computer audio."

If the Zoom Room isn't available and you need answers, you can email us at

Join Zoom Chat